Reply to Explain to Me How You Fund and Staff a Deal for All-in-Development

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Explain to Me How You Fund and Staff a Deal for All-in-Development"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]15:19 again.  Some of you are over-complicating what I was suggesting.  It doesn't need to be a complex process.  It can be as simple as (1) those that got an A in the class last year get put in one of the advanced classrooms, (2) those that got B or C get put in an on-track classroom, and (3) those who got D or F get put in a catching-up classroom.

Or alternatively, DCPS could simply use each student's PARCC score to roughly group the students by current achievement level.  It's not meant to be a ranking, but rather just a rough classification to focus the teaching.

No extra teachers are needed because it's just subdividing the same students by achievement level, so that teachers can gear the classroom style to best fit the students sitting there.  Lots of school systems do this; it's not complicated.

Why won't DCPS try this out?  Especially since it's something lots of parents seem to want at up-and-coming schools, DCPS could institute it on a trial basis at one middle school (Hardy for example, or maybe MacFarland) to see how it works.  [/quote]

First off, they are in the subjects where achievement and proficiency is easiest to detect -- math. Hardy, SH and Deal all do this now. Jefferson has said it would if there are a minimum number of students to make a class (~20). And the Algebra mandate will make it happen at other schools.

You held out Deal as the model here -[i] that's all they have[/i], aside from so many kids that they have to have 3 separate baseball teams because of the size of the enrollment.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics