Reply to HR 1313 -- Emloyees will need to choose: disclose genetic information or pay higher premiums

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "HR 1313 -- Emloyees will need to choose: disclose genetic information or pay higher premiums"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You're  exaggerating.  Wellness programs often need to take blood to establish baseline measurements like on cholesterol, a1c, blood glucose.  Wellness programs were shut down because of the POSSIBILITY that genetic information could be obtained. It was never the intent of wellness programs to collect genetic info.  Costs need to be controlled, especially for self insureds, and wellness programs were helping make workforces healthier, decreasing absenteeism, and decreasing overall health costs by 5-15% depending on the quality of the program and corporate participation.  It is an example of throwing the baby out with the bath water.[/quote]

Please explain how it's an exaggeration.  Many sources are reporting that this bill would allow employers to require genetic information, or impose large fines on employees.

https://www.statnews.com/2017/03/10/workplace-wellness-genetic-testing/

[/quote]

It's an example of over hystericalization of a minor finger prick to assess progress in a corporate wellness program.  It penalizes people who won't participate to take proven steps to improve their diabetes compliance, improve their cholesterol, among other things.  They also reward employees who meet other health goals.  This has to be part of a three leg stool to reduce health costs:  patient compliance, provider/hospital/medication/insurer fee control, and best evidence practices.  Without all three, the stool doesn't stand.  That's how health care costs get reduced for all of us while maintaining excellent care.

But I suspect the real problem is once blood is drawn, the use of illegal drugs can be monitored, which is the real reason behind the manufactured hysteria.[/quote]

No the real reason is that many people are carriers of genes that may be somewhat possibly linked to a disease they may or may not ever get, and so based on whatever "research" an insurance company decides they will (manufacture) rely on would then lead to no coverage for a "preexisting condition" once they do away with that protection too.  And the consumer will have no way to disprove the genetic "research."[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics