Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "This latest Time magazine cover pretty much summarizes the state of the Democratic party"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Jeff didn't like my opinion on the Democratic Party. So he deleted my entire s/o thread. Was this opinion really so bad? I'm trying to help you here: "The thread on the Time magazine cover got sidetracked. The the reality is: over the last 8 years, you blew it, democrats. You held the WH and both houses; you had it all. But your win came during the worst financial crisis in decades, when our already out-of-control debt skyrocketed. -your response? Ram through a massive expansion of the biggest part of deficit spending: entitlement spending through Medicare/Medicaid under the ACA. Really?? Then there were Gruber's "stupid voters" comments and "if you like your plan. . ." After that fiasco, you failed to close Guantanamo as promised. Worse, you paid the Taliban (ok, you technically paid Quatar, who paid the Taliban) millions and exchanged 5 really aweful Guantanamo terrorists for - Bowie Bergdahl??!? Follow those dumb moves by championing the dumbest, least-important issues and making them priorities: toilette laws and gun control (which, in 1992, lost you both houses). On top of that, the U.S. experienced the worst spike in heroin deaths in decades and you responded by: needlessly releasing convicted drug/gun offenders? Really?? How can you be surprised at your lack of popularity? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics