Reply to Has sex become more vanilla?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Has sex become more vanilla?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For most women, the translation from freaky to vanilla sex is part and parcel of their overall declining interest in [b]sex with their husbands specifically, not sex in general[/b].  [/quote]

Fixed that for you.  Guaranteed that all of the DWs professing their lack of interest in sex would change their tune if another man was in the picture.  Monogamy is hard.  Even harder for women.  [/quote]

Why is monogamy harder for women? If a man wrote that monogamy is harder for men this thread would be set on fire!!!! I've been monogamous for 35 years and if you have the right partner it's not that tough. Have I ever been tempted or thought about not being monogamous? Of course, I'm not dead! But why would I wreck what I have? Monogamy is really hard if you're not happy with what you have. [/quote]

Let me clarify.  Staying FAITHFUL is just as hard for both.  But for women, staying INTERESTED in sex with the same man is more difficult.  Read the endless posts here where men decry their wives' lack of interest in sex with them, while wives decry their husbands' unwanted interest in sex with them.  Most DHs posting here just want their wives to WANT to have sex with them.  Most wives posting here on the subject want to have as little sex with their husbands as possible.  Even the ones who are genuinely trying to meet them halfway are doing the bare minimum to keep their husbands from straying due to lack of sex.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics