Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Fritz responds to Ferrer's motion: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.677.0.pdf

More twists and turns. They point out it's unfair for Lively to get discovery from Ferrer while they cannot, and then put out an offer for all parties to stipulate that no one can use "any communication to, from or concerning Ms. Ferrer, or any testimony from her, in any manner in this action."

As far as the addresses for Ferrer, they say they didn't pull them out of thin air and would be happy to tell the court what due diligence they did. The point about her address was one of the only relevant topics in Ferrer's motion opposing alternative service so you would think they would address that directly.

They don't mention the AI hallucinated case. That's fair considering it's irrelevant and also Ferrer didn't identify the case or submit any exhibits on it, but still I thought they might address it and confirm it is false, just to save face.[/quote]

TBF they can’t say the Court Order prevents us from discussing non relevant topics like indemnification and then discuss the AI accusation (which doesn’t even cite a particular case as being AI).

I believe the redacted section points out   of the addresses one of the addresses served was taken from the Lively disclosure.  Obviously that one worked for lively.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics