Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’d have to look at the sharing agreement but I think it may be the case that WF cannot get access to the Ferrer documents until she accepts service and provides a written response, which may explain these seemingly ridiculous actions by her attorney.  I do think their are several categories of documents sought by WF that were not sought by Lively so once the subpoena is properly served, there would need to be a meet and confer between Ferrer and WF before further motions could be filed.[/quote]

No, that's not how discovery works. You are required to turn over everything, and document discovery was drawing to a close by the time WF subpoenaed Ferrer. Someone on Reddit put them up side by side (the Lively and WF subpoenas) and they are identical. It makes no sense that they were subpoenaing Ferrer for docs they already received from Lively. And there's no allegation Lively was withholding them either, if that was the issue, WF could have filed a motion to force Lively to share.[/quote]

They definitely aren’t identical.  I can see that with my own eyes.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics