Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The really interesting unsealed doc is this one:  
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.605.1.pdf

It's the email after the one announcing the Scenario A / Scenario B, after they had a meeting to decide which one to pick, and explains that it's Scenario B but increased price to $30K and also some additional work is added in.

The additional work includes:   "Leverage relationships with Discord. Reddit, X, IG, TikTok, You Tube, etc. to expose behavior of Blake and other parties. Both current and past, and engage directly with communities to adjust or influence the conversations taking place in real time."  Also SEO and manipulation of google search results; takedown of problematic reddit accounts, "changing the narrative" all of which would leave "no fingerprints."  Cost was $30K/month and Wallace was paid $30K two days later.

But Jed Wallace says he just monitored socials lol.

[/quote]

So basically your typical Hollywoood PR tactics, just different in name. Yawn.[/quote]

Right, what is missing here and what needs to be made more clear is how these tactics are different or more importantly, illegal. Everyone knows comms crisis and PR in Hollywood is messy and dirty as hell. How is this different than any any other campaign more importantly, like I said, how is this illegal. How is this different than Blake’s campaign to try to take over the Barbie movie and smear and leak the people involved with that.

I’m just not seeing what’s illegal or what’s different about any of this[/quote]

Now you sound like some flak for Baldoni tbh. Obvs this is different because they added in language about planting bad  stories on TikTok and other media about Lively. Hint:  That’s what a smear is.

I also think the SEO stuff and manipulation of google results is work we didn’t know about before, but am not sure. But the main thing for me is planting stories about Libely and pushing them. That’s what a smear is, guys.

No wonder why they had to file a motion to compel to get this doc. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics