Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So Blake’s unredacted testimony is consistent with the current focus of their legal strategy, the only actions in the smear she had “personal knowledge” of were Freedman’s post complaint public comments.  Who knew Blake and her lawyers  had ESP and could foresee this before it happened to describe in the Complaint?

Sure seems like her retail action claim is DOA.[/quote]

Why was the language “unredacted”?[/quote]

Would you prefer unsealed?  [/quote]

You am not questioning word choice, but rather I missed say 20 tabs on DCUM and apparently 20 some motions so genuinely asking what happened that resulted in that language that was redacted to now be visible to public? Did BL side move for it to be unsealed and judge agree or was this just the judge compromise for getting rid of deposition as an exhibit? Wondering the legal process of it as would have thought BL side would have preferred it not be visible to public.[/quote]

It seems to have been the judge's decision alone to unseal. Her depo would include both confidential info and non. Wf quoted two lines from it regarding stuff that's already known in public (that Lively considers Freedman’s conduct to be an ongoing smear campaign) but attached her entire depo as an exhibit, sealed. Lively filed a motion to strike that exhibit. Wayfarer redacted those two lines in its letter but the judge said while striking the full depo, those two lines from their letter could be unsealed since there's no apparent reason they should be confidential. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics