Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Fritz responds to the motion to strike Lively's depo: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.576.0.pdf
[/quote]

Why even bother? Liman is going to grant her motion, right before he asks Gottlieb to join him on his family vacation at the beach house.[/quote]

Dp, but right again.  Liman is such a joke of a judge.[/quote]

Aww, look at you, thinking this is bias and not actually a wholly sound decision.  Keep thinking Wayfarer has great lawyers and is just been badly mistreated by the judge, that's really working out well for you.[/quote]

You can have this meaningless rucking, team Wayfarer got what they wanted on the motion to quash.  We all know Blake’s depo was a disaster by her attorneys crazy actions over the part week.  But hey, you’ll always have the MTD decision and Liman’s heart.[/quote]

Re the MTQ, I know that's the way all the non-lawyers over on reddit are looking at the decision, but team Wayfarer very much did not get what they wanted.  They need to provide an official answer re 1-4.  Gottlieb didn't get what he wanted on 7-8 and can't come back, that's true.  But on 5-6, the communications between WF attorneys and CCs and the media, Gottlieb totally got what he wanted.  The judge said that for now, you can't get that info through the Liner Freedman firm but the WF parties have to obtain the Liner Freedman's firms records (if necessary, but they are presumed to have access to their client file) and provide you this information themselves.  So Wayfarer did not want to provide that information but the court has told them to provide that information.

And you know this is really a distinction without a difference because it's really the lawyers who are going to be doing this work on Wayfarer's behalf, and not Wayfarer itself.  So the court basically told Liner Freedman to provide Lively exactly the same info they didn't want to provide, except send it as though coming from Wayfarer rather than the Liner Freedman firm.

And the totally silly thing about this is that GOTTLIEB ORIGINALLY ASKED FOR THIS INFO FROM WAYFARER first.  It didn't want to bother Liner Freedman.  But Wayfarer said no we're not giving you that info.  Well, now they are.

Sure doesn't seem like Lively's deposition was a disaster.  Fritz can't even properly interpret what Lively's refusal to give him attorney client information means lol.   [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics