Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I haven't read the decision yet, but, good for Liman, I was almost thinking he was going to give it to them.

As for the next thing Gottlieb requests, it looks like a doozy. First they want to strike the transcript of Lively's depo from the docket (I think they raise good points here, there was no need to post the entire, unverified transcript when citing two lines) https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.540.0.pdf

Then, a big motion for sanctions against Freedman for being a big meanie  https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.546.0.pdf

The docket has a zillion exhibits to TMZ, etc (#547) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69510553/lively-v-wayfarer-studios-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

Perhaps Liman will grant the motion to strike with a harsh rebuke, in lieu of actually granting the motion for sanctions, consistent with what he's done in the past.[/quote]

But the depo transcript made exhibit to a letter was filed as confidential so public cannot see it so what is big deal? Does it mean if don’t strike the transcript it becomes public after the case is over? Would it be public even if case settles or just if go to court? Not following why need to strike the transcript if gen public can’t see it anyway? What is process?[/quote]

Once you file something under seal here, the opposing party has a week to argue it should remain under seal and why.  If they don't file anything, the doc automatically gets released.  So filing the whole rough draft transcript under seal makes busy work for Lively's attys in having to, presumably, go through the whole (rough draft!!! not even proofed yet!) transcript to say what should be confidential and what can be released.

It unnecessary when Fritz was only using the dep for a 2 page pin cite.  The normal practice is file just those 2 pages and any surrounding context you might need. The even *more* normal practice is NOT to file the entire transcript of a dep that is still a rough draft ASCII copy lol. They did it purely to be jerks and maybe get the dep in front of the judge, or more likely the judge's clerk.  Very on brand for them.[/quote]

The Lively team has been acting like jerks this whole process, love that Team Wayfarer is finally fighting back! WOO HOO![/quote]

This PP was also off in bananaland, thinking filing the dep was a good move.  I was the PP patiently explaining why you shouldn't do that, and hey, guess who the judge agreed with?  Sad.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics