Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Perez has gone loco.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.577.0.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.578.0.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.579.0.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.580.0.pdf

[/quote]

lmaooo. How do we think Liman is going to react?[/quote]

I bet he's never been called sexy before in a filing.  :shock:

I find it funnier thinking of Hudson or Gottlieb firing off an indignant motion to strike. The humanity! [/quote]

What he should do is sanction Hilton.  Those filing are not appropriate.  [/quote]

I think if they were remarks against someone else, the judge might do something.  But as long as the criticism is pointed specifically at the judge, I think it will roll off of him and he knows that he's expected to let it roll off of him.

That doesn't mean Liman will grant him any of the relief he asked if it's not warranted.  Anyone who says Liman is biased here is bananas because Hilton has thrown the wildest insults at him and yet Liman still (within hours of receiving a filing complaining about unredacted residential addresses from Hilton) immediately sealed some pleadings containing residential addresses and also required Hudson to prove that she had sent Hilton unsealed pleadings needed to understand and respond to her filing.  He took these actions pretty immediately, and they benefitted Hilton.  So anyone who says Liman is biased isn't really looking.

That said, Hilton has used ChatGPT and filed two pleadings so far with hallucinated cases.  So I don't think he's going to win on the *substance* of any of the pleadings against him.[/quote]

I am PP above and I am the poster who has made posts before about being right about things other posters here have been wrong about (PO being granted for Lively, dismissal of Baldoni's complaint, etc.).

However, I was totally wrong in my comment above, because the judge just filed this order (re Hilton):  "ORDER: Recently, a number of filings in this case have included intemperate language and personal attacks against parties, their counsel, and the Court. All individuals filing documents in this case whether represented or notare advised that they shall not in any submission to this Court use language that is disrespectful of the parties, their counsel, or the Court. This includes, but is not limited to, using demeaning nicknames for parties or their counsel or accusing the Court of being in words or in substance biased, criminal, or corrupt. As further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 8/8/2025) (ks) (Entered: 08/08/2025)"

I thought Liman would sit back and take it but apparently he is not down with that ish.[/quote]

LMAO, 5-4-3-2-1 until Perez posts a new video... ME, INTEMPERATE???!!!
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics