Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hilton has also bashed Lively's attorneys as unethical and incompetent. Not even sure if the judge can sanction a pro se, non party. To me the smart move for team Lively is to just ignore those parts and not engage with that stuff. It's what he wants. It was already kind of weird they said something about asking Hilton for attorney's fees. I don't think it would be a good move to ask for sanctions or to strike his letters. Just ask for the discovery and make a move if he's ordered to produce it and doesn't. [/quote]

I agree Hilton is digging his own grave here and that everyone involved should probably just let him. It's clear to everyone he's using the court docket and these filings for personal publicity and financial gain, no one has to point this out or convince Liman of it.

My guess would be that Liman will be looking for a way to largely dispose of the Hilton issue so that he can stop dealing with him. Make a definitive ruling on what he must produce and when, get it done, move on. He still might wind up a witness at trial but if they can just move past the discovery issues concerning him, everyone can move on. Hilton is going to try to prolong the debate here because it's personally profitable to him to be able to post ongoing filings and debate over his involvement in the case to his channel. But he's also an idiot so it really shouldn't be that hard to sew this up in the next week or so. His involvement in the case may be relevant (he was identified in the TAG interrogatory, no getting around that) but it's not like he's a central character.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics