Reply to Second round options for Woodward boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I prefer Option A. Least amount of split articulations across all schools.[/quote]

That’s not true. It’s actually B for the broader MCPS community. The delta between the current split articulations to possible new split articulations in entire county is the LEASt with option B. I’m not speaking for any particular neighborhood. But option B is most equitable for the camp that cares about split articulations in the broader community. Not just their block[/quote]

+1 that is true.

A = 20 splits; 42 no splits
B= 16 splits; 46 no splits
C= 22 splits; 40 no splits
D=20 splits; 42 no splits

currently there are about a 10-12 splits.

if you are opposed to split articulation, B does the the least "damage" boundary-study-wide.

also, looking at the data more closely, B does a better job generally keeping schools with less drastic splits. i think the elemtnary study will lower this further.

it would be equitable to advocate for B if you are in the "no splits" camp

personally, split articulation doesn't seem like a major issue and shouldn't be given much weight by those making the decision. ignore the PTAs crying about it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics