Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ugh, the above formatting didn’t turn out right. I was responding to the post that said TAG says Candace and Perez disseminated info on their behalf. Did they really admit that?[/quote] Disseminating was my paraphrase. Sorry for any confusion. The actual wording is a little different but I still feel it's enough to subpoena him. I went back to the docket, and this is the actual language from the interrogatory discussed in their motion. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.564.0.pdf On March 14, 2025, Ms. Lively served TAG with interrogatories, including ones that asked TAG to identify: • “all Content Creators with whom You have communicated in any manner, concerning Ms. Lively, Mr. Reynolds, the CRD Complaint, the Actions, the Lively/Reynolds Companies, or the Digital Campaign from May 1, 2024, to present” (Interrogatory No. 5); and • “all reporters and news or media outlets of any kind with whom You have communicated, directly or indirectly, in any manner, concerning Ms. Lively, Mr. Reynolds, the CRD Complaint, the Actions, or the Lively/Reynolds Companies from May 1, 2024, to present” (Interrogatory No. 6). ECF No. 294, Ex. 6.13 The Court compelled TAG inter alia to answer both interrogatories— ncluding through the present—subject to defining Content Creators to “mean[b] ‘any individual or entity who seeds, generates, creates, or influences Social Media content or provides related digital or social media services directly or indirectly at the request of, or on behalf of, any Wayfarer Party or their agents or affiliates.’[/b]” ECF No. 355, at 3-4. On June 25, 2025, TAG served supplemental responses to the interrogatories, including to identify Mr. Hilton as one of four Content Creators who seeded, generated, created, or influenced social media content or provided related digital or social media services directly or indirectly at the request of, or on behalf of, any Wayfarer Party or their agents or affiliates. ECF No. 552, Ex.14. 554, Ex.14.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics