Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't like Perez, but is it just me or do Blake supporters act a little hysterical over him? He was gross back in the day, but no one takes him seriously now and everyone thinks he's a loser. Blake supporters act like he's some sort of violent misogynist and that platforming him is an act of violence, when Blake is the one emboldening him and giving him the attention he craves by sending over those subpoenas. [/quote]

I don't like Blake but refuse to cheer for Perez. He is and has always been revolting. I tried to watch one of his videos about this subject but I just can't. Nails on a chalkboard.

I view him as a parasite and don't really care what happens to him here. I don't think he is working for Wayfarer and doubt going after him will lead to a legal win for Blake, but I'd be fine with him getting knocked around by the court for all his behavior because he's really awful.

Actually, shutting up Perez Hilton might make me respect Lively a little. [/quote]

Knowing certain little about him, just the little have now read and seen, there is NO way would ever subpoena him unless the beyond last resort- is this where BL team is? 
 [/quote]

DP. I read their motion, and some of it is really silly... that basically Perez posts relentlessly anti-Blake with dramatic headlines, and he's been a Freedman client, and he happens to be repeating the main Freedman talking points constantly (essentially, that Blake is lying and Baldoni is a good person who is telling the truth, which are pretty mainstream opinions). They said something similar at the July 30 hearing about Candace Owens and Megyn Kelly. But this isn't enough, IMO.

However, Candace and Perez were on the list of Content Creators that TAG said disseminated stuff on their behalf. There's only 4 on the list, so it's not like it's just a list of who got email blasts promoting the movie. Lively's attorneys would really be remiss not to subpoena those 4 people for those communications. They are asking about their agreements and comms with Wayfarer and their counsel, not bank account info and that stuff. That was insane to try to get that stuff from anonymous content creators with no links to Wayfarer, but the Perez one seems quite reasonably targeted at relevant evidence. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics