Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Any bets on whether Lively will be deposed or not tomorrow? Also, don’t engage with the bot, better to just ignore than engage.[/quote] She’s not getting deposed. It’s not happening. I think it’s cute when lawyers are like, “lol she HAS to get deposed whether she wants to or not.” She’s just not. This whole lawsuit is a farce. [/quote] PP Now, of course, I don't know her master plan. It could entail her hoping to get what she wants out of discovery (she won't; there was no smear campaign), leaking it, then withdrawing the lawsuit out of duress. Only her and her crackhead husband know what their next steps are, but a deposition is not in the cards. [/quote] I have always thought these sorts of theories were nutty, no offense, but I kind of see this being possible now. That's actually a pretty good theory that she wanted to find stuff and just leak it to rehab her image. She could have just filed a bunch of motions appending the various proof of payments or bots or seeding and then worked with legacy media to push it out. It actually sort of explains some of these ridiculous subpoenas were out of desperation. Note they referred to 107 content creators in court today, not the 43 we know about. Maybe they put out the idea the content creators were on the TAG list because they thought people would get scared and comply before it was made public. Ouch. I just always sort of felt and argued that Lively's lawyers must have explained to her what litigation means and how nasty it gets and that she would have to understand that you have to be deposed and turn over texts and all that. We'll see. I'm 50/50 on her deposition happening. I have a feeling it won't happen tomorrow because why ruin her record of making Wayfarer counsel fly out to NY and then not doing it? I will say in her defense that some of Wayfarer parties claimed not to even be available until August, and AFAIK none of them have been deposed either (possibly the Wallace parties have) so it's not entirely fair to blame Lively for not having done hers yet. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics