Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Request for TLDR summary- when judge says “ if Numbers 1 to 4 are no longer at issue, you have won, Mr. Gottlieb,” what are the numbers referencing? Discovery production questions? What is it that Gottlieb will have won?[/quote] It's a separate docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70536155/liner-freedman-taitelman-coolet-llp-v-lively/ I guess it's this request: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.974420/gov.uscourts.cacd.974420.1.3.pdf 1-4 is content creator stuff which Garafalo said the answer is zero so Liman said then why fight it. So presumably he will order them to produce those and they will say nothing. 5-8 is the meat of it. #7 is huge. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics