Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "So what happens when the Federal government can’t issue Nov Food Stamps?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Some people even got tattoos years ago and then fell on hard times and qualify for snap now. Weird that people are fixating on things that are not necessarily indicators of people's current level of need. In a country like ours, nobody should go hungry. I can't imagine any person of genuine goodwill actually disagreeing with that statement. What is going on in this thread?[/quote] I think 95% agree with that statement. I certainly don’t want anyone to go hungry and support programs (public and private) to feed people. However, I also believe that every individual is responsible for using their best efforts to feed themselves and their dependents before turning to government or others for assistance. Obviously, many do and others cannot due to disability, age, etc. They should absolutely be supported. [b]But there’s also a portion of people (of all demographics) who don’t make that effort and/or persist in making awful life choices. The entire dispute comes down to how to deal with this group[/b].[/quote] I get your sentiment but it's more work and cost to try to chase down and punish these people than to just provide a benefit trusting that it will be a safety net for the "right" people. If you are just interested in cost it's a no-brainer. But too many people are interested in ethics, "cheaters" and being hall monitors. I get it; it's human. But it's a scarcity view. We would do better to have a star trek plenty view. [/quote] I appreciate the point, but think we’re missing the forest for the trees. Big picture: [b]entitlement programs (SS and Medicare in particular) are unsustainable and, if maintained at the current levels, will literally bankrupt the US.[/b] SNAP is an inconsequential part of this, but the principle is the same: in order for society to function, everyone who is able to do so must take responsibility for themselves. Of course we should have government support for those who can’t care for themselves, but we can and should enforce the principle to the extent possible. For the good of and indeed the survival of our society. [/quote] No. This country has enough wealth and resources to guarantee every single person a minimum floor of quality of life. Food, safe quality shelter, education, and healthcare. The money exists. What is unsustainable is average taxpayers subsidizing sub living wages, only for corporations to funnel money to the 1%, and for our government to funnel billions upon billions of dollars into the military industrial complex. Every other western democracy has figured this out. It is not a matter of ability, it is a matter of will. We the people need to start demanding that our government start working for US again. [/quote] This is a dramatic oversimplification. First of all, those nations generally have lower growth and far higher unemployment than the US (see Spain to take just one example). Second, they are able to do this only because of US military spending. We’re effectively subsidizing their defense. If we lowered our military spending, (a) it would make their models unsustainable, and (b) wouldn’t begin to pay for what you’re describing. Is what you describe theoretically possible? Yes, in the short term, but the cost would be very high indeed and we as a whole would be far less wealthy. [/quote] We aren't subsidizing anyone's defense. We are running a protection racket. [/quote] Don’t be silly. Western Europe exists in its present form solely and almost exclusively because of US military expenditures over the last 75 years. [/quote] We’ve got a sophisticated thinker here, folks! Real intellectual powerhouse. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics