Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just don't understand why a parent would fight for their kid to play down. When i was young if you werem't the same ability as kids your age you didnt play. The crazy parents were the ones fighting for their kid to play up against older players on an older team. Sometimes these parents were justified. Sometimes they thought their kid was better than they were. But it didn't matter because the older kids would sort that out on the field with the younger player.[/quote] The push to playi down started 20 years ago but became more mainstream 10 years ago. You see it all the time at private schools.16 year old freshman are becoming the norm for private schools that recruit. Youth Soccer has always been grouped based on a 12 month calendar. The cheaters hate it and want to change soccer into another GY sport. This will never happen because clubs control competition and college recruitment pathways. Clubs make much more money not implementing GY not allowing players to play down.[/quote] Adding on... This is why Christian Lavars (the ECNL grand puba) said on the first podcast where they brought up switching from BY to SY. That he didnt agree with players playing down. He said this to calm all the ECNL clubs that know GY would quickly translate into less revenue if implemented.[/quote]FYI, the discussion was in reference to playing down on age when trapped and had nothing to do with school grades. He said this because it created temporary disruptions for the younger team; like too many players for half a season. They also were/are generally against playing up in age except in very rare cases.[/quote] So the change from BY to SY was to accommodate more players playing with their grade in school... Got it[/quote] Exactly! You cant have it both ways. ECNL is going to implement a rule not allowing Aug birthdays to play down with players a grade below then in school.[/quote] The player should not play down in the younger grade players' team. It is a hidden bully with a subtle middle finger.[/quote] Normal people understand that playing down is crap. Crazy people (probably a liberal woman who never played sports) wants to make everything inclusive and fair so even the oddballs that cant tie their shoelaces have a spot on the team.[/quote] How do you or anyone define the terms playing down? If kids are the same grade? Because any window of time the older players are technically playing down as well? Is a January kid in BY playing down? No soccer league is going Grad Year but for people to cry about it so much what sad losers. [/quote] A Jan kid in BY is playing with their grade. A July to Dec kid in BY is playing up a grade. You dont even understand what you're arguing about. Nobody in BY plays down. [/quote] Age is the main determinant by far of a playing up or down advantage, not what grade you are in. [/quote] Ok if grade plays no role in switching from BY to SY why change? Just stay BY if grade in school doesnt matter.[/quote] It’s supposed to help increase participation and ease recruiting. Sorry your July kid is going to be among the youngest next year. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics