Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Popcorn Planet guy just filed something against Blake in Florida.[/quote]

Interested to know if Lively will try to get it moved to Liman.

There are a few new motions on the NY docket. Many many letters and motions calling out the tactics. I know they will fall on deaf ears, but still good for them.

It seems to take a few days for the non-parties' stuff to be posted, so they are still posting responses to Hudson's letter that were apparently written prior to Liman's ruling. He rules quickly for Lively or against CC and when CCs make well-reasoned motions he sits on them until Lively has a chance to respond, then gives Lively what she wants before the CCs can answer.

I had previously posted it seemed unfair that he was giving the pro se CCs just two business days to respond to Lively's oppositions, but since Lively withdrew them, the CCs ended up getting less than one business day to respond (Hudson's letter posted Saturday July 26 and Liman ruled first thing Monday mooting them. So efficient!). Now the CCs are pointing out they also asked for a PO ruling that Lively cannot issue further subpoenas without a court order, since Lively's withdrawal is open ended. Liman should honestly do it for his own sanity so Lively doesn't clog up the docket with dozens more of these.[/quote]

I wonder if Liman would rule differently if one of these CCs retained a lawyer who also clerked for the same Supreme Court Justice he did. That would be fun to watch. Or do lawyers have an unspoken code -- do not take on any cases that would shake up the incestuous circle they're all part of?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics