Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is she going to do this 37 more times? 
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.497.0.pdf[/quote]

Truly an unhinged move on her part[/quote]

I'm not defending the legal strategy behind these subpoenas (I question it also), but calling this "unhinged" as though your guy hasn't done much, much worse is certainly a take. You guys are still loathe to discuss Baldoni's entire legal complaint getting completely dismissed (and commonly attribute this to judicial bias lol!), much less Freedman's fake punching of his opposing counsel.  You might want to consider some of these things in proportion to one another because you're going to be in a for a shock the next time Freedman promises to do something he never does or Fritz signs a sworn declaration attesting to what the legal standard is.[/quote]

This is a really strange way of looking at this case. It was Blake who started this mess. She went to the New York Times with the story and filed this insane lawsuit. It’s pretty clear that Justin hired a communications crisis firm to help him with the communications crisis Blake created. It was absolute insanity to ever accuse him of a smear campaign.

Hollywood PR is dirty and gross and no one should know that more than Blake, who has used every dirty trick in the book to claw her way into a career. Justin was just playing the game because she set it up and no one would blame him for that. We all know this. What Blake is doing is truly embarrassing. It has cost her her hair company, her friendship with Taylor, which was probably her single greatest asset in celebrity world, and millions of followers and fans.

But yes, let’s talk about how crazy Justin‘s lawyer is lol. [/quote]

"It was absolute insanity to ever accuse him of a smear campaign" when Baldoni actually hired and paid THREE different PR firms PLUS a specialist in TX to design and execute a "most importantly, untraceable" campaign after Baldoni specifically signed an agreement promising Lively he would not retaliate against her for raising the harassment issues she did.  After the people who designed that campaign bragged that "you know we can bury anyone."  After the people who designed the campaign told one another that they were pretty sure Lively was sincere about her harassment complaints and really believed he did those things to her, but also noted the campaign was being really successful because "it just shows how people really want to hate on women."

This is a really strange way of looking at this case.  It was Baldoni who started this mess by harassing Lively in the first place. He ultimately doubled down by filing a $400M defamation claim against the woman who accused him of harassment -- and it's exactly this kind of defamation claim launched in response to accusations of harassment that is commonly being recognized as just another retaliatory tactic itself, and especially so here where none of the claims in Baldoni's complaint even survived the motion to dismiss stage.  This is extraordinary -- you don't seem to have any clue how completely nuts it is that not a single one of his dumb claims against hers survived when Freedman bragged about how he was going to ruin Lively for weeks and when he claimed the lawsuit was worth $400M.  *poof*

But oh no, some subpoenas trying to get financial info about the smear are withdrawn.  THE HORROR.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics