Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There definitely was a reason Gottloeb let Esra take the lead of these subpoenas.[/quote]

Because he didn't want to get his hands dirty? [/quote]

Exactly[/quote]

They've gotten so brazen I'm surprised they think these subpoeanas are a step too far. Like why stop now? Maybe because the lawyers were finally getting scrutinized and they didn't like it. [/quote]

So, I think Lively's attorneys are more traditional and have a sense of decorum before the court. It's a different style than Freedman who posts some wacky public stuff like the Taylor Swift letter. I'm not saying the Lively side is more ethical. They did Vanzan. That was never assigned to a judge, they just slid in there and did what the wanted to get a subpoena with a veneer of legitimacy, even by filing a sham lawsuit because no one was watching. I guess they were hoping the social media sites would cooperate and they could just sneak in there. Once they were actually being questioned in public and actually were going to have to answer to the judge and defend their actions, they couldn't, so they scurried away when a light was shined on them. And even then, they still only want it quashed for those who questioned them, they are still trying to slip in and hope they can get something on the other 38 or so creators who didn't file. That is so distasteful. I feel like at this point, if the judge won't quash the entire subpoena, Google and X should request that, because it makes no sense that the subpoena is identical as to each content creators but only some are being quashed.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics