Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Liman orders that responses to the first batch of creator MTQs are due August 1 and responses due August 5. That's two business days which is standard in his court but seems short for pro se non-litigants (especially if Lively drops it at 11:59 with a billion attachments...). There seems to be a strong sense of community among the creators so hopefully they'll help each other out, but really, this sucks. From reddit, Lively's attorneys have a meet and confer scheduled with this mustache-twirling villain who speaks into a spatula. Wild, wild stuff. Great version of the Godfather theme! This is the one who had only one subscriber at the time. She has over 2000 now. :lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTlFSLIkOho[/quote] I mean, to be clear, it's two business days but four actual days since it occurs over the weekend. I think you're right to be a little worried for the CCs because I think Lively's opposition(s) will address mostly the relevant legal issues and not all of the effluvium that these folks added to their motions due to lack of legal knowledge or just general desire to stick it to Lively. So their replies might have to do a lot of heavy lifting, when usually replies are targeted to shoot down opponent's best theories or miscited cases. Still, the CCs get the benefit of the weekend.[/quote] The facts are going to matter far more than the law for these motions. Either Blake does or does not have specific prooof to indicate these people worked with Wallace or Tag or she doesn’t. If she doesn’t, she isn’t getting their financial info.[/quote] It's Liman. He doesn't care if Blake has proof or not. He will give Gottlieb the legal roadmap on how to ask for what he needs and then give him a back massage. These CCs are screwed. I feel bad for them.[/quote] I'm thinking back to that crazy overbroad subpoena Lively issued early on to the phone companies and how he struck that down quickly. Yet I've become more skeptical of him the last couple of weeks, so I don't know. I guess it also depends on what Lively's justification turns out to be. He has already indicated he agrees that they can ask for smear campaign material after the filing of the CRD and lawsuit (relevant because many of the creators didn't start covering Lively until 2025!). I hope he will do the right thing by these people regardless of how they are dissing him. They're just regular people.[/quote] Yeah, Perez Hilton is just like you and me, poor guy![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics