Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is there discussion to end the consortiums? Seems like such a waste of busses.[/quote] Sort of, but they may end up creating six regions across the county instead, so still a lot of bussing.[/quote] The wealthier schools have everything the kids need. The reason for the DCC was that these schools don't have nearly the same things and it gives kids opportunities to go to a school where they might have it.[/quote] This is categorically false. Look at the per pupil funding downcounty. It is MUCH higher than anywhere else. [/quote] Do your schools have multiple bands, marching band, gymnastics and crew, stem clubs, ap classes? Then you have a lot more. [/quote] I want to echo the PP. The schools receiving the most per pupil funding at not the W schools. I am curious why you think any programs or activities are provided by MCPS. If someone "has more" its because the kids advocated for it do the work run a club, or sport, activity or advocacy group. It's great leadership and something any student can take on. I heard the recent SMOB candidates talking about the school booster clubs in some schools have like they are part of the problem (???). My school's booster club spends an inordinate amount of time trying to raise funds for basic school property maintenance. Things I would think MCPS would cover. It's rather sad.[/quote] Having more per pupil funding does not equal having higher (or even similar) levels of educational services. The funding would have to change to be dramatically more than it currently is in the less well-off areas to effect that. And that dissimilarity in service levels is that which needs to be addressed, whether it be utilization rates or classes available.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics