Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Lock him up indictment FL"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Attempting to destroy evidence that's been subpoenaed -- that seems particularly serious. The DOJ has a witness who can testify that "the boss" wanted the subpoenaed surveillance tapes destroyed. How on earth can TFG wriggle out of this one? [/quote] Carlos De Oliveira transmitted the message from Trump to the employee who was asked to delete the tapes. If he does not flip and testify, he could go to jail and Trump would be safe because what the employee heard regarding Trump's wishes is hearsay.[/quote] No it’s not. FRE 801(d)(2)[/quote] (d) Statements That Are Not Hearsay. A statement that meets the following conditions is not hearsay: (D) was made by the party’s agent or employee on a matter within the scope of that relationship and while it existed; or (E) was made by the party’s coconspirator during and in furtherance of the conspiracy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
