Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Fritz can't demand that Lively "no longer allege that anything concerning the so called 'campaign' is untraceable" though, lol, when it's their own people who called it that.

That said, I support Lively and thought the letter from Hudson was decent last week - but not if the overlap on their subpoenas is only one name lol.  That's not a good showing at all.

I wondered whether there could be a misunderstanding here, like some people were the same but their online identities in the subpoena didn't match how they were listed in the ROGs, but that seems unlikely.  So this effort by Lively's team gets an F from me.  Boo.

Can't really imagine why they would have filed that motion, only for that, except maybe they though Wayfarer wouldn't dedesignate and they wouldn't win with Liman so this info would have stayed secret?  That just seems incredibly dumb.  Having a hard time understanding this tbh.

In other news, I do really enjoy the schadenfraude from the insurance carrier telling Sarowitz THERE IS NO WAY WE ARE PAYING FOR THIS when you took out the policy AFTER you found out about the harassment claims, and yet still didn't tell us about it, lol.  Looks like the money Sarowitz will be losing really will be his, and not passed off to insurance.  w00t[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics