Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Does Wayfarer have standing to intervene in support of the content creators' motion to quash?[/quote] No. Only grounds would be privilege and there's no possible way to assert privilege over the creators' Google account subscriber information.[/quote] Adding that this is true for the subpoenas to Google, X, and any other platforms seeking account info. Wayfarer theoretically could move to intervene in support of MTQs filed by the three creators (Candace O., Andy S., Perez H.) who received more extensive individual subpoenas for comms etc. For Perez I guess they could assert attorney-client privilege. For the other two, they could assert work product if they brought them on board as litigation-related contractors. But that in itself would be a pretty huge admission.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
