Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not sure about that head mod (I've seen theories about them, but not enough firsthand observation to say). But that account that made the "conspiracy theory energy" post is legitimately WHOA. Especially if you look at their deleted posts, including their first on this case claiming to have insider info from set (I remember CCs making content about that post):

https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search?fun=posts_search&author=Gabrielahearst&before=2025-05-29T16%3A31%3A39&limit=10&sort=desc

I seriously hope Mike Gottlieb or Esra Hudson sent a preservation notice to Reddit for this account's subscriber info.[/quote]

Example of CC (Dave Neal) making content based on that Redditor's now-deleted "Information from the set of It Ends with Us" post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IriUOehSNrM . 20-minute video, nearly 100K views.[/quote]

Sorry, not following here. What is the implication? That this redditor might be feeding pro-JB narratives at the behest if someone in that side?

Not being snarky, genuinely asking.[/quote]

The main way these digital campaigns are believed to work is by seeding and then amplifying. IF that Reddit account is TAG or a TAG subcontractor, their "Inside info from set" post (which very specifically advances a narrative that would be useful for Wayfarer's defense, not just a generally anti-Blake narrative) would be an example of seeding and the video would be an example of amplifying. Not all amplification would be through CCs who were in direct communication, witting or unwitting, with TAG. Some, like Dave (whose account has not been subpoenaed that I know of) are just reliable creatures of the algorithm and will make videos about whatever Reddit post is getting the most traction that day.

It goes without saying that none of this is yet proof of anything. But I can guarantee you that this is the kind of thing Blake's lawyers and their investigators are pursuing in discovery.[/quote]

Not gonna click that weird arctic link but I'm guessing this is referring to that reddit post that was circulating from around the time of the premiere with the "insider" that knew Blake was considering going to the NYT because Justin called her hot, or something like that. That one pinged for me as planted too.

If TAG posted something in a public forum like that, and a content creator finds it and comments on it (as any of us can do), that is way too attenuated to subpoena that content creator, especially for geolocation, bank account numbers, and so on. [/quote]

No, this is actually a different, since-deleted Reddit post purporting to be from an insider. (I believe the one you're referring to was planted as well.) The arctic link - understandable you wouldn't want to click - is for the Reddit archive, where you can see and search since-deleted posts: https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search/ . You can search that Redditor's account name (gabrielahearst) in the "author" field if you're curious. You can also click the Dave Neal YouTube link where he reads the post and shows it on screen.

Agreed that a creator finding and amplifying this kind of content would not be enough, on its own, to subpoena their subscriber info.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics