Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Oof this r/IEWU post clocks Blake supporters

“The conspiracy theory energy is getting out of control

At first the narrative was that Justin Baldoni and his team is paying content creators to run a smear campaign. Cold hard cash. Now that the content creators are denying this there seem to be more unhinged theories to try to support a drowning narrative.

Dead drops. Secret Discord DMs. Hidden burner accounts. Anonymous emails from a shadowy PR operative cackling in the dark.

And now we’re at: “Well, maybe the content creators didn’t even know they were part of a retaliatory smear campaign 😢. Maybe TAG manipulated them 🥺. Maybe they were unknowingly weaponized 💔.”

This has turned into QAnon for white women who think every TikTok is secretly government psy-ops. You can’t keep inventing increasingly unhinged explanations just because the facts aren’t going your way. At some point, you’re just implying a PR firm mind-controlled the entire internet to hurt one wealthy celebrity with a losing harassment claim.”[/quote]

Hang on, is the side who claimed Lively supporters here were tracking people’s locations through their IP addresses somehow and that we all had to be the same poster because “turtles all the way down” was apparently too obscure of an expression — is this the group that is now saying that Lively’s attorneys are pursuing bizarre conspiracy theories?

Hold up, let me get a pen to take detailed notes on all of your extremely serious concerns lol. [/quote]

All Lively supporters are like how the Reddit post described. On the other hand, you're describing one -- and I mean, ONE -- poster on DCUM. Okay.[/quote]

Not sure why you assume the "they're tracking our posts" and the "turtles all the way down" complaints were made by the same Baldoni supporter here while all Lively supporters somehow have some inside line on what discovery Lively is pursuing and so can fully understand and defend every doc request and subpoena.  Gottlieb will seek whatever discovery he is entitled to to try to trace the connections between the parties and content providers to the degree he is able and allowed, and that's his job.  You seem upset about it, but it's a little hard to take you guys seriously when you all have so many conspiracy theories running it's hard to keep track.  When Travis Kelce stopped following Ryan Reynolds that clearly meant Gottlieb had tried to extort Taylor Swift, amirite?

I agree that one of the "sides" here has a conspiracy theory problem, but I don't think it's Lively.  Dude is just seeking all the discovery permitted that the judge will allow.  That's how Gottlieb got the list of content providers from TAG in the first place, because the judge narrowed the ROG:  "It does not include any person who can generate, create, or influence online content, but only the much smaller subset of those who do so on the behalf of or at the request of a given Wayfarer Party."  If you're worried about conspiracy theories, look inward![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics