Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "2029 Girls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cap players have the recruiting success because they have the grades/academics and/or their parents can pay ivy tuitions. But people seem to conflate that with elite lacrosse talent. At Princeton et al, a huge % of superb lax players are eliminated due to academics and finances. No one seems to mention that elephant in the room. [/quote] Correct. To get into an Ivy for lax you need have the grades, etc that would make them a contender as a regular applicant. Lax can give them an edge. Girls are not going to Ivy or NESCAC for lax who would not otherwise belong there. [/quote]I'm not sure where you get your information, but Ivy athletes would have a small minority that would be contenders for getting in without playing their sport. That includes women's lacrosse. [/quote] I think he/she means not that they would absolutely get in, but that they would have the credentials to do so. [/quote]Of course, that goes to the definition of contender. Only a small minority would be contenders.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics