Reply to The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps

Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion

Reply to "The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Melania-new outfit worn to North Carolina today.  Black combat boots, black leggings, black beanie, aviator sunglasses and olive green puffer jacket.[/quote]

Pic or link?[/quote]

It's cute! 
/(Trump hating Dem for those who think we can't say anything positive)

[img]https://pagesix.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/01/first-lady-melania-trump-president-97246851.jpg[/img][/quote]

Wow, she really does not give a damn. [/quote]

I hate her but have to say she was visiting western NC. So, I consider this appropriate. Dumpy is not wearing a tie—also appropriate.

However, Dumpy told hurricane victims he wants to get rid of FEMA and make states pay for disasters. He only has a concept of a plan…

Not sure how places like MS or NC would pay for a billion in damages? But it would probably make cheap real estate available to billionaires.

[/quote]

It really wasm't appropriate. It was the most IDGAF outfit she could put on, without having those words actually written on the back of her jacket. I'm not outraged by it - more just rolling my eyes. Here we go again.

I think the sunglasses and scowl are what really make it look weird. She looks like the hot older mom at school dropoff before going to exercise class. [/quote]

What would be better to wear to a disaster zone?

I did disaster work, and we never would dress up in those situations—even if we were not doing the labor. The people who appeared on TV would be dressed in jeans to seem more appealing.

[/quote]

Well jeans would have been a lot more appropriate. You can look at literally thousands of photos of elected officials and their spouses at disaster sites to see what is more appropriate than black tights, a puffer, and a giant scowl.

Here are the Bidens, just for one example:

[img]https://media.firstcoastnews.com/assets/WTLV/images/c4dc21d8-7073-4461-94d6-b075f734525d/c4dc21d8-7073-4461-94d6-b075f734525d_1920x1080.jpg[/img]

DeSantis wears some weird clothes to disaster sites - a campaign vest and high white boots, for example - but he's not pantsless.

You put on something that makes it look like you're ready to pitch in and work if need be, but is also clean and respectful to the people you're seeing. That outfit she's wearing is not respectful to the people she's seeing - she's making it look like she doesn't care (which, accurate!) and is there because someone dragged her out of bed and didn't give her a chance to put on an outfit.

That time she wore a (very expensive) flannel shirt and jeans to do some gardening would have been appropriate. This is not.

[img]https://focus.independent.ie/thumbor/y2GIBmMqDJRQq-B5LZYS_AlIOXg=/0x0:1500x2267/fit-in/960x640/prod-mh-ireland/21336628-c0e0-11ed-8617-0210609a3fe2.jpg[/img]

Anyway who cares. The semiotics of her wardrobe are clicky but inconsequential. Fook FEMA.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics