Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Blake filed a request to serve Wayfarer's head of HR via alternative means because they've attempted to serve her at her last known address on 9 separate occasions to no avail, neighbors at the address say they've never heard of her, and Wayfarer and their counsel refuse to accept service or acknowledge her whereabouts.

That's.... weird. She's not some very tangentially related third party. She is the current head of HR for the company and was head of HR for the entire period of Lively's employment relationship.

I think this is the third person Lively's requested alternative service for, for similar situations (including Jed Wallace). No one wants to be served with a subpoena or a lawsuit but evading it doesn't work -- it will make its way to you eventually. This one is extra odd to me since she's a current employee and so central to the case.[/quote]

I don't understand why they didn't attempt to serve her at her office or on Wayfarer's counsel. They posted two requests for alternative service today and they were both over a 9 day or so period in late June/early July. They could have been on vacation. [/quote]

They did attempt to serve Wayfarer's counsel as well as Barnes Slaters' counsel:

"In addition to the nine attempts to personally serve Ms. Barnes Slater, Ms. Lively contacted counsel for the Wayfarer Parties to determine whether they do or would be representing Ms. Barnes Slater in this matter and would be willing to accept service via email. Counsel for the Wayfarer Parties advised that they do not represent Ms. Barnes Slater, and other counsel did not respond."

I don't know why they didn't attempt to serve her at Wayfarer's offices. Perhaps she works from home? I don't know but this number of alternative service requests is odd to me, especially for employees of the defendant corp.[/quote]

I saw that but was thinking in terms of Wayfarer's general counsel, not necessarily their attorneys in this litigation which is what I think that paragraph is referring to. But yes, it's all very odd. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics