Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]So, plot twist:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.449.0.pdf

Hudson files a letter asking the judge to compel TAG to unmark their Interrogatory Responses as AEO, claiming that TAG marked the response on which content creators they were communicating with as "trade secret" and misusing the AEO designation.

Lively is basically complaining they are using DARVO to make her look bad by obscuring the names of the creators, which makes Lively unable to defend herself and explain why these creators were issued subpoenas.

They are implying that the names of the creators subpoenaed are on that list - and that's really all some of us have been asking for in terms of some kind of reason why these particular creators were subpoenaed besides being anti-Lively. OTOH, part of me thinks this is too convenient, and they just want people to infer the creators are on the list and perhaps that's not really the case. It seems to me they could have made this motion immediately upon receiving the AEO responses instead of waiting until they got bad press about the content creators. So... interesting![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics