Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Interesting to learn that some Lively supporters are anti first amendment and pro turning over your financial info for no reason at all.  And yet they can’t fathom why Blake is organically unpopular.[/quote]

Right, if there's one thing both sides should come to an agreement on, it's this. Honestly think it's disgusting that they think our rights should be trampled on to protect a C-list CW star. [/quote]

Yes, you can think Lively has a case for SH or retaliation or that Baldoni and Freedman are sleazy while also not agreeing with every tactic BL ever employs. Its sus when anyone is agreeing with one side 100% of the time, even saying they would totally agree to get a subpoena from Freedman![/quote]

If you don't have anything to hide why would you care about being subpoenaed. Especially in this case where the individuals haven't even been subpoenaed, just subscriber info about them from a third party platform.[/quote]

If you don't have anything to hide, why don't you post your IP address and personal information here?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics