Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OMG, those texts are not “concrete evidence “ of contact with the users they subpoenaed. Please stop playing lawyer, you obviously aren’t one.[/quote] That is concrete evidence that Baldoni specifically wanted to see negative content about Blake online, and Abel confirming that's what Nathan/TAG can do an citing Tik Tok, Reddit, and IG as venues for this content. It also shows Abel and Nathan discussing these demands from Baldoni and how to convey to him that they can do it without specifically saying in writing what they are going to to do. Additionally, [b]Lively has subpoenaed lists of content creators from TAG that they communicated with regarding Lively or Baldoni (this list is under seal so we have not seen it)[/b]. Yes there is concrete evidence. [/quote] It was unsealed yesterday: https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/comments/1m2xgdz/the_list_of_creators_tag_contacted_and_what_they/#lightbox[/quote] Nevermind - This is "media" which I guess is different than "content creators." I got confused because it had Deux Moi, Candace, etc.[/quote] Right, the CC list is still under seal. I think the distinction here might be that everyone on the media list presents as a "reporter" and in particular, cites sources. This kind of makes me laugh regarding Candace Owens, who regular says she's getting tips from sources but then will just report things that are floating around Reddit. Her source is Reddit. But the CCs list would be composed of people who present as commentators, not reporters. So more clearly just sharing their opinions and not trying to frame it as "news." I am curious about a few creators who definitely straddle this line though. Like Popcorn Planet and Dana. They are definitely providing opinions but sometimes do frame it as news and will say they've received info from a source. Curious if they are on the CC list or not. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics