Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t think she is saying tell me who they are so I can expose their identity to everyone. I think she’s saying tell me who they are so I can figure out if they were getting paid to smear me. And I don’t mind that.

People who post shit on x and other social media are ultimately responsible forbthebshit they do post imo.[/quote]

In which case, there is a poster here than Freedman and Wallace should subpoena.[/quote]

I'm one of the posters you are referring to here and I'd just like to state that I'd have no problem with having Freedman and Wallace subpoenaing my personal info to see if I'm being paid to post here, because I'm not, and I'd actually welcome the opportunity to prove to you that I'm a legitimate poster so you would stop accusing me of being a "paid shill" just because you can't come up with actual arguments against what I post here.[/quote]

Yeah, honestly, me too, your incessant focus on how all lively supporters are paid shills and no rational person would ever truly believe her while all Baldoni support is totally organic is stupefying. You have really drunk the Kool Aid. [/quote]

I've been called a paid shill on this thread many times for posting things that I don't even consider pro-Lively. Like posting a criticism of Baldoni's lawyers or their legal strategy, or even just a neutral post explaining a legal concept or one of Liman's decisions in a way that doesn't support either side. If you don't attack Lively directly or interpret every bit of info in this case in the best possible light for Baldoni, you're a "paid shill" for Lively.

It's fascinating because then I see people posting in this thread stuff that is clearly not a pure personal attack on Lively -- criticizing her appearance, her marriage, making fun of how she talks or something. And no one ever says "you must be a paid shill for Baldoni." That's how crazy this thread is. An informative post explaining how motions to dismiss are decided for non-lawyers who might not know, that doesn't even pass judgment on the validity of any of the MTDs in this actual case? Paid shill. A post calling Lively ugly, speculating she's on the verge of divorce, or diagnosing her with a psychological disorder? Totally fine.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics