Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t think she is saying tell me who they are so I can expose their identity to everyone. I think she’s saying tell me who they are so I can figure out if they were getting paid to smear me. And I don’t mind that.

People who post shit on x and other social media are ultimately responsible forbthebshit they do post imo.[/quote]

In which case, there is a poster here than Freedman and Wallace should subpoena.[/quote]

I'm one of the posters you are referring to here and I'd just like to state that I'd have no problem with having Freedman and Wallace subpoenaing my personal info to see if I'm being paid to post here, because I'm not, and I'd actually welcome the opportunity to prove to you that I'm a legitimate poster so you would stop accusing me of being a "paid shill" just because you can't come up with actual arguments against what I post here.[/quote]

Are you married? Do you have any shared bank accounts with your DH or maybe your kids or an elderly parent? Are you sure they would all be OK with a subpoena for those records?![/quote]

Who is subpoenaing bank records? Lively has subpoenaed identifying info only. No one is getting bank info here and they won't unless there is evidence to show payments from one of the parties.

I think some of you don't understand how subpoenas work. These subpoenas aren't even served on the content creators or X users at this point. They are being served on Google and X to provide user info so Lively can see if there is anything there that would justify seeking additional info. Most of these subpoenas will come to nothing because Google or X will provide this info and it will become immediately obvious these are not paid employees of Wallace or TAG, and there will be nothing further. The users will only be directly subpoenaed if unmasking them reveals anything suspicious.

And again, if Freedman or whoever wanted to subpoena Jeff for my IP address and posting history, I would have no problem with that because all it would turn up is that I'm a regular person with no relationship to any of the parties in this case who has posted periodically about my actual views. No one is getting my bank statements off that, lol.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics