Reply to ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "ICE Shooting in Minneapolis "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Please explain how jumping in front of a car and shooting at the driver's face is going to increase the safety of the shooter or any bystander. [/quote]

There was no "jumping in front of the car".

[b]The ICE agents were preparing to arrest the decedent. T[/b]he ICE officer shooter had walked in front of the car, which was going in reverse, preparing to arrest her. The victim suddenly placed the car in drive, hit the accelerator in a reckless fashion, then hit the ICE agent with her vehicle (Honda Pilot).

One point of view is that the reckless driver attempting to escape law enforcement officers presented a danger to the community especially so after hitting an ICE agent with her SUV.

Unfortunately, people will interpret the video as they wish to support their political leanings.[/quote]

Lawyers - do ICE agents have jurisdiction to arrest a someone for blocking a street lane? I am asking out of genuine curiousity.[/quote]
Yes. Obstruction of justice; obstruction of a law enforcement officer in the performance of his/her duties.[/quote]

Other cars went around her without problem. Why did this one stop and shoot her? What "justice" was being conducted by the officer that shot her at that time?[/quote]

Why is she using her car to block and decide who gets by? is she in charge of traffic?[/quote]

What does it matter? How does that even justify the second and third shots through the driver’s side window?[/quote]

How many time are you allowed to fire if someone is trying to kill you with their car?[/quote]

LEO training says zero times. Do not shoot at a moving/fleeing vehicle or person. [/quote]

There are very special circumstances when firing into a moving car is warranted but otherwise, killing the operator of a moving vehicle is a big time no-no for obvious reasons. Any street cop knows this but this idiot wasn't a street cop and hence the larger problem.[/quote]

So cops are not trained to cover with lethal in this scenario? Did you attend a Learing Center for your POST certification?[/quote]

No, dimwit, cops are not trained to use deadly force when there is no imminent danger. Firing multiple rounds into the driver's side window of a vehicle is the definition of using deadly force when it's not necessary. Don't believe me? Ask any cop worth their badge. Cops are trained protectors. Not trained to kill. Idiot [/quote]

Yes, and even if he had been in danger (which the video contradicts) continuing to fire into the side windows removes the self defense justification.  Especially since it looks like those are the bullets that killed her.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics