Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]ECNL has a flawed business model and the failure of McLean and Brave are just symptoms of this, not the cause. [/b]

The best boys (A/A+) are not in ECNL, they are in MLSN. There are not enough boys in the B+/A- range to populate as many boys ECNL teams as there are A level girls to populate the girls teams. The best girls want ECNL, the best boys do not. So, why does ECNL think there can be as many competitive boys teams in this area as girls teams?

Blend all the boys ECNL and ECNL-R leagues and allow for promotion or relegation. The girls are fine as they are. [/quote]

That is exactly right. ECNL needs to come to grips with the fact that their boys league is a sinking ship. ECNL clubs are going to either switch to MLS Next or bleed players to their neighboring MLS Next club(s). This merger isn’t going to lead to FVU boys teams…so what then?[/quote]

The b boys are sitting on the Arlington and Alexandria benches instead of getting playing time. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics