Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]ECNL has a flawed business model and the failure of McLean and Brave are just symptoms of this, not the cause. The best boys (A/A+) are not in ECNL, they are in MLSN. There are not enough boys in the B+/A- range to populate as many boys ECNL teams as there are A level girls to populate the girls teams. The best girls want ECNL, the best boys do not. So, why does ECNL think there can be as many competitive boys teams in this area as girls teams? Blend all the boys ECNL and ECNL-R leagues and allow for promotion or relegation. The girls are fine as they are. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
