Reply to Roy Moore the Pedophile

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roy Moore the Pedophile"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Which is worse - the last minute fake news bombshell or the concerted effort of both the left and never trumpers that is obvious?[/quote]

All you people who are questioning the timing—seems like you want to prevent Alabamans from hearing about Roy Moore before they send him to the senate for 6 years. You make everything sound like a conspiracy but basically you want to keep Alabama residents from hearing any negative news.[/quote]

[b]The WaPo’s endorsement of the opposition can before the story. [/b]And they drum up an activist at random?[/quote]

Link or it didn't happen.[/quote]
Google is your friend. That little fact is no secret, nor surprise, given WaPo's bias.[/quote]

All sources are biased.  What matters is the accuracy of the reporting.  [/quote]

If I say they need to name their 30 sources, you will say "they don't have to". That is correct, they don't. And therefore, I don't have to believe they have 30 sources and that the story is accurate. They can simply make up anything they want, publish it, then hide.[/quote]

Except they can't "hide," this isn't some anonymous blogger, this is one of the top three papers in the country. The Daily Caller--founded by Tucker Carlson--explains it pretty well for those of you too numb to figure it out on your own:

[i]If the Post story were fabricated by liberal media schemers to frame Moore and undermine his candidacy, the number of people implicated would be immense. The newspaper would have to trust each of them never to expose the sham, even though doing so would garner immense favorable publicity.

Consider this: the story’s three authors, all their editors, the women interviewed, and multiple other on-the-record sources confirming the reports would have to keep the Post’s secret. None could ever tell spouses, friends, or family members without widening the circle of people who could demolish the whole enterprise.

Further, every detail of the ruse would have to be so meticulously planned that no news outlet sympathetic to Moore could ever do its own research to expose the deceit.

Finally, if this scandal is fake news, at least a half-dozen Washington Post journalists with extensive experience and great resumes would have to care enough about destroying Moore to risk their entire careers and reputations. And Bezos would willingly gamble the lasting value of a brand he paid a quarter of a billion dollars to buy.[/i]

http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/10/moore-molestation-scandal-cant-be-fake-news-or-wed-know/[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics