Reply to Roy Moore the Pedophile

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roy Moore the Pedophile"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There seems to be a contradiction between mother and daughter....no surprise...

[i]

Citing Corfman, the Post reported:

After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. [b]She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, [/b]and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house. [/i]

Corfman clearly claimed she spoke to Moore on what she said was “her phone in her bedroom” on at least one of those occasions. The Post did not specify whether the second or third alleged calls purportedly took place on a bedroom phone.

When her mother was asked whether or not her daughter had a phone in her room, this was the reply:

[i]
Wells, Corfman’s mother, was asked by Breitbart News: “Back then did she have her own phone in her room or something?”

“No,” she replied matter-of-factly. “But the phone in the house could get through to her easily.”[/i]

It's details like this that trip up stories - this is why police often question people multiple times in multiple ways - they want to see the inconsistencies that appear. Those inconsistencies are what leads an officer to break open a case.

What this is going to do is cause liberals here to me suppositions: "I bet she stretched the phone cord" or "Perhaps the cord was long enough for her to take the phone in her room?"

And those will just be 'perhaps' and 'maybes' and 'I bets'. That's it. That's all.

[/quote]

This is neither a police investigation or a trial.  A candidate for Senate isn’t entitled to a presumption of innocence or a standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.  This is being tried in the court of public opinion, as these matters often are, and was the case of Juanita Broaddrick, which the right-wing noise machine ne was fine sith  Moore doesn’t have a David Brock running around trying to dig up dirt.  And the best he can do is offer non-committal comments about his “customary behavior.”  Moore should put on his big boy pants.  It’s nobody's fault but his own that he took them off in the first place.  #GOPervs #GOPedos[/quote]

Everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence, at least in my world. I thought the Dems were a party of facts and science? [/quote]

The WaPo laid out the facts based on first-hand information that was careful and thoroughly vetted and corroborated.  It even went so far to point out that one of the women has had financial difficulties.  Are there “alternative facts” you would like to share?  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics