Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Lively definitely wanted to postpone the deposition, don’t insult our intelligence.  Gottlieb shut down  every other option at the hearing.  Babcock wanted to go ahead with it, was already in route.[/quote]

Why? To what end? She will have been preparing for this deposition for some time now, she's probably quite nervous about it. There is no advantage for her to a sudden delay.[/quote]

Well she mutually agreed to it so I guess she wanted it.[/quote]

To avoid being deposed twice. A delay is better than being deposed twice. But holding the deposition as scheduled would have been preferable to both options, which is why Gottlieb scrambled to try and find a way have the depo happen as scheduled. This was obvious from the hearing. Gottlieb was advocating for ways in which Babcock could participate in the scheduled deposition, he was not advocating for a delay.[/quote]

Yes he was, the judge asked if the parties were amenable to a two week delay and Gottlieb was the only one who said yes.  Read the transcript and stop gaslighting.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics