Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
The people who think this is a win for Lively or represents bias toward Lively by Liman don't actually understand what happened.

Go back to Lively headquarters and demand better talking points, because no thinking person who has read this day’s transcript agrees with you.[/quote]

Sorry any thinking person disagrees with you.[/quote]

So then how come it doesn't represent bias? That's what I thought.[/quote]

Because Lively doesn't want to postpone the deposition, and now it's postponed. Gottlieb lobbied to proceed with he deposition as scheduled but find a way to get Wallace temporarily back in the case (via a dummy complaint or having Liman temporarily vacate the dismissal) so that Babcock could participate in the deposition and they could do it this week, one time.

But Babcock reasonably doesn't want to do his portion of the deposition until he's seen the actual SAC, so it's postponed. It's a win for Wallace, a negative for Lively (perhaps not as bad as having to sit for two depositions, but not a win), and maybe neutral for Wayfarer.

How can this "represent bias" in favor of Lively if she didn't even get what she wanted? Also, ultimately the decision wasn't even made by Liman here. He deferred to the party and they decided, via a meet and confer, that the best option was to delay the deposition until after the SAC. Liman signed off on that but he didn't force it on them. He didn't really advocate for any one solution in the hearing either, he was just kind of acting as a broker, suggesting possible solutions and acknowledging that the issue had been caused by the timing of his dismissal. Had he dismissed last week, Lively could have put together an SAC quickly before the deposition, but the late hour made that impossible.[/quote]

Is SAC a motion to compel? What does SA stand for?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics