Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There was no reason to delay the deposition other than the judge agreeing with Gottlieb that Wallace couldn’t get a bit more deposition time if Gottlieb added new claims to an amended complaint.  Obviously any additional deposition questions would have to be connected to those new claims, if any and it would not have been lengthy.

Maybe Liman realized the schedule he ordered yesterday doesn’t allow Blake enough time for content producer discovery, and this is a reason to extend.  [/quote]

I agree. She lives in NY. It really is not a big deal if she had to sit again for an hour or so to be questioned by Babcock, especially since she already gets her choice of venue and everything she wants. Babcock is unlikely to question her about sexual harassment or anything intense. Relations between Babcock and Lively's counsel have been completely civil. This is nothing like Freedman with his MSG comments and saying he's ready to depose her anytime and Liman saying they only are going to get one shot, which I find fair enough.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics