Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]There is a huge difference between someone like that Popcorn Planet guy who apparently posted an exclusive comment from Freedman and therefore is in contact with a Wayfarer party/counsel, and randomly requesting records JUST because someone said negative things. The google records aren't going to prove whether those people were in communication with Wayfarer, so then BL will have to subpoena their bank records, etc. That is too much. What if they had a garage sale and deposited some cash - are they supposed to prove it didn't come from Bryan Freedman? You can't prove a negative (ie prove the CC wasn't paid off or seeded content by Freedman/Wayfarer) so they can just theoretically keeping looking and looking into these people until they find something. That is insane. The onus should be on BL's team to prove a nexus between the CC and Freedman/Wayfarer as an initial matter.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
