Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]IMO, the decision that really showed Liman’s bias was requiring Wallace to release the names of all his clients, while basically acknowledging in his briefing order that he didn’t have jurisdiction over Wallace. If Wallace loses that motion to dismiss, he should appeal.[/quote] +1 my opinion on Liman began to change with that one. This deposition ruling seems wonky too... the expedited schedule and zero explanation for the ruling, not even a two line "Lively overcomes the presumption by citing security concerns given the media frenzy over the case." I'm not even saying I would disagree with a reasoned ruling for Lively there, but I didn't see a true articulated threat to her security.[/quote] The Wallace decision really soured me too.[/quote] Same. Really put off by that decision. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
