Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Sloane has filed a reply brief in the sanctions motion.  https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.420.0.pdf

I haven't read the the whole thing except glancing over the footnotes first (as always ha!) I noticed this:

"Confronted with James Vituscka’s sworn declaration, the Wayfarer Parties weakly assert that his “recent disavowal of his prior statements is not credible,” effectively accusing him of having committed perjury. Opp. at 24. The Wayfarer Parties did not, however, provide declarations from the two people Vituscka communicated with (Melissa Nathan or Bryan Freedman), publish or otherwise furnish their communications with him (which the Wayfarer Parties inexplicably withheld from the Sloane Parties during discovery), or explain how Vituscka’s specific and sworn to statements were incorrect. It is beyond dispute that the Wayfarer Parties were in direct communication with Vituscka at all relevant times and could have verified allegations attributable to him with little difficulty. See Ex. A (Dec. 23, 2024, email chain between Vituscka, Nathan, and Freedman inviting Vituscka to “Feel free to come for request for comment here”). They instead chose not to undertake any investigation whatsoever into what were clearly false allegations they intentionally included in highly publicized court documents."

Exhibit A (not that exciting ha):  https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.420.1.pdf[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics