Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Did NAG get yet another decision wrong? Has she gotten anything right? (Team JBer here, if that matters.) [/quote] I think so -- on Sunday night she read the Wayfarer party letter re the dep location and thought it was very measured and "took down the temperature of the room" and took the air out of Lively's arguments, where she looked like a "prima donna." https://www.tiktok.com/@notactuallygolden/video/7526726103587769613 NAG didn't address Wayfarer's failure to address Freedman's alleged behavior at the Vin Diesel meet and confer or really deal with how incendiary Freedman's MSG statements were (she said the statements were awful but that everyone seemed to be past that!). Anyway. This is not the way Liman saw it, and that's not because Liman is biased. Multiple people in this thread said before the ruling that Shuster's letter didn't properly address Lively's safety concerns, and just made fun of them instead. This was predictable, but NAG is in a bit of a Baldoni-fan bubble imo.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics