Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^ and one of them is a woman who has been identified off here but I won’t dox anyone. She spends time on Reddit too. She is obsessed with freedman. No one else cares much about lawyers but she drools over him. [/quote] She has ruined this thread. [/quote] It's totally exhausting. [/quote] +2 I don't want to report them as to not annoy Jeff, but they need to socially pressured to stop spamming about their Freedman obsession.[/quote] + 3. I wish she would get a time out at least [/quote] +4. She has her own freedman thread to go obsess over him and refuses to go there because no one responds to her. [/quote] The non-Lively Freedman thread was for Freedman cases/info that aren’t relevant to the Lively case. I don’t follow Freedman cases generally except for that Vin diesel example, and that was because his behavior was so threatening that it seemed likely to become relevant TO the Lively case. WHICH IT NOW HAS because Lively’s lawyers have filed those Vin Diesel pleadings in the Lively docket. Freedman’s behavior and possible involvement in the ongoing smear is relevant to the Lively case and you not wanting to talk about this here because you support Baldoni is unfortunate for you but not my problem. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics